Skip to main content

Brazil

Fixed Broadband Experience
October 2025

Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.

Author: Fiona Armstrong-Mills, Principal Analyst Data Collection Period: May 29 - Aug 26, 2025

Brazil

Fixed Broadband Experience
October 2025

Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.

Author: Fiona Armstrong-Mills, Principal Analyst

Data Collection Period: May 29 - Aug 26, 2025

Key Findings

National

The fastest broadband speeds are with Vivo

Vivo wins the awards for both Download and Upload Speeds. It does this with a Download Speed result of 114.8Mbps, over 18Mbps faster than the next placed operator. For Upload Speed Experience, Vivo also places top, with a score of 67.2Mbps.

Nio wins for Reliability Experience

Our users on Nio see a Reliability Experience that scores 547 on a 100-1000 point scale. Nio is narrowly ahead, with second-placed Vivo just behind at 541 points. Reliability Experience measures the ability of a household to successfully connect to the internet, and then complete a range of tasks across multiple devices.

TIM and Nio tie for Broadband Consistent Quality

TIM and Nio score 74.1% for Broadband Consistent Quality, placing them as the joint winners for this metric. Broadband Consistent Quality measures how often a connection is suitable for a range of common applications — measuring from the perspective of a single device once connectivity is established.

Regional

Across the top 10 cities in Brasil, Vivo users experience the fastest download speeds

In all 10 of the cities included in this report, Vivo users experience the fastest download speeds. In half of these markets, Vivo wins the award outright — while in the other half it ties with other providers. In Brasília, Manaus and Salvador the operator ties with TIM, while in Recife it ties with both TIM and Claro, and in Goiânia it is a four-way tie with Claro, Nio and TIM.

TIM wins for Consistent Quality in six of the 10 cities included

TIM takes the lead for Consistent Quality in six of the 10 cities, including outright wins in Manaus, Recife, Salvador and São Paulo, and joint wins in Brasília (Giga+Fibra) and Goiâna (Nio). As TIM does not meet our inclusion thresholds in three of the other cities, this means it wins for Consistent Quality in all but one (Rio de Janeiro) of the markets where it is included.

National providers dominate across the cities, but local providers pick up some wins.

National providers take home the majority of wins across the 10 cities included in this report. However, some regional operators do rise to the top. Among these is Brisanet, which wins for Consistent Quality and Reliability in Fortaleza, as well as tying for Upload Speed in the same market. It also ties with TIM for Reliability Experience in Recife.

Market Overview

Fixed broadband continues to grow in Brazil. As of December 2024, there were over 52.5 million reported fixed broadband lines, up 8% compared to December 2023. According to TeleGeography, Brazil finished 2024 with a household penetration rate of 57%, well below the regional average for Latin America.

What is clear is that the market is still growing. A key driver for this growth is TV based Internet usage. 53.5% of Brazilian users now access the internet from their TVs — more than those using a computer — and this figure has grown 3.7 percentage points in the 2023-2024 period. This growth in streaming services has led to Brazil becoming the second-largest market for Netflix, and being touted as a “streaming powerhouse”.

This rising demand for bandwidth-heavy applications like video has accelerated the need for fiber. As of July 2025, Anatel data shows that 78% of connections were fiber. However, there remain significant underserved areas, particularly outside of major cities, where fiber is still needed.

At the same time, market dynamics are evolving. Brazil’s fixed broadband market is extremely fragmented. Estimates suggest there are 10,000 to 19,000 internet service providers (ISPs). Smaller providers (Prestadoras de Pequeno Porte or PPPs) now combine to control 57.0% of the market as of Q2 2025. In large part, this is the result of these smaller providers pushing fiber into midsize interior cities. These cities are traditionally underserved by the larger national providers, however PPPs have been able to step in to fill the gap. PPPs have benefited from a number of regulatory incentives, including regulated prices for wholesale access in some areas, and reducing the regulatory burden on smaller operators leading to lower operating costs. As such, it has been easier for PPPs to deploy service in areas that might be more economically challenging for the larger providers.

However, despite the success of many PPPs, consolidation is happening. Larger groups are now acquiring smaller players to gain scale. In May 2025, Brasil TecPar acquired three regional operators – ALLREDE, Sempre Internet and OnNet. This is in addition to the over 25 acquisitions the operator had already made since 2021. Meanwhile, Giga+Fibra (under the Alloha Fibra group) began 2025 with nearly R$800 million available to acquire more small providers. This move was situated as a bet that sooner or later, consolidation is coming to the ISP landscape.

These moves also reflect the growing pressure of upcoming changes that will make it harder for PPPs to survive independently. Anatel is becoming stricter, beginning with extremely small providers. New rules now require licenses for very small ISPs with fewer than 5,000 subscribers, which were previously exempt. However, the bigger challenge for PPPs across the board likely comes from changes in taxation, as Norma no. 4 is phased out. The change clarifies that fixed broadband access is not a Value Added Service (SVA), and should now be characterized as a Multimedia Communication Service (SCM). This will increase the tax burden on regional operators, which will likely now have to pay additional state taxes in some states. Operators have until January 1st, 2027 to prepare for this change.

Wholesale neutral host networks play an important role in facilitating and sustaining this landscape. To date, all providers have benefited from neutral host networks such as V.tal, FiBrasil, and I-Systems. These companies offer wholesale open-access infrastructure, which allow both large and small ISPs to serve customers without building full infrastructure themselves.

But here too we see consolidation. While many of these neutral host networks were built as joint ventures, ISPs are now showing interest in regaining majority ownership. Telefónica now holds a majority stake in FiBrasil. Meanwhile, news in August suggests that TIM is considering acquiring IHS Towers’ stake in I-Systems. Such a move would make it the full owner of the neutral host network. As the tax differentiation between providing broadband access and operating the underlying fiber infrastructure is phased out, it likely makes owning the underlying fiber network more appealing to fixed broadband providers.

Taken together, these shifts — from rapid growth to slower saturation, from fragmentation to consolidation, and from incentives to tighter regulation — show that Brazil’s fixed broadband market is entering a new, more mature phase. In this next phase, competition shifts from land-grab to service quality. Meanwhile, consolidation seeks scale efficiencies and rural gaps persist. Against this backdrop, network experience — consistency, speed, video and reliability — becomes the key differentiator that we examine in this report.

In this report, Opensignal looks at the real-world fixed broadband experience of our users across Brazil, as well as in the 10 largest cities by population. We measure five aspects of user experience: Consistent Quality, Download Speed, Upload Speed, Video Experience, and Reliability.

In our national comparisons we focus on the providers which are also recognised by Anatel as the “big” providers in the market — Claro, Vivo, Nio (previously Oi) and TIM — which have the largest population coverage. We then include smaller players in our city breakdowns, where they offer significant population coverage and a representative market share.

This report analyzes the end-to-end real-world situation across all users’ plans which includes transport over a provider’s core network and connectivity onto the sites and content delivery networks that host popular services, apps and websites. A user’s fixed broadband experience is also affected by the router they are using. Therefore, broadband providers’ scores vary, despite the use of shared wholesale networks. Our data is filtered to exclude readings from devices connected to Wi-Fi hotspots.

National Fixed Broadband Experience

October 2025, Brazil Report
Download Image
Overall Experience
Reliability Experience
Consistent Quality
Download Speed
Upload Speed
Video Experience
Reliability Experience
100-1000 points
Nio
547
Vivo
541
Claro
535
TIM
507
100212.5325437.5550
The brackets represent confidence intervals.
Read why confidence intervals are important.
Download Image
Consistent Quality
% of tests
Nio
74.1
TIM
74.1
Claro
73.2
Vivo
72.9
019385776
The brackets represent confidence intervals.
Read why confidence intervals are important.
Download Image
Download Speed
in Mbps
Vivo
114.8
Claro
96.5
Nio
95.6
TIM
90.8
0306090120
The brackets represent confidence intervals.
Read why confidence intervals are important.
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Mbps
Vivo
67.2
Nio
54.6
TIM
54.0
Claro
34.4
017.53552.570
The brackets represent confidence intervals.
Read why confidence intervals are important.
Download Image
Video Experience
in 0-100 points
Vivo
71.0
Claro
70.8
Nio
70.1
TIM
69.7
019385776
The brackets represent confidence intervals.
Read why confidence intervals are important.
Download Image

Definitions

Opensignal's Broadband Reliability Experience measures the ability of a household to connect to the internet and to successfully complete 'uninterrupted' tasks across multiple devices, encompassing work and recreational activities. While Reliability incorporates and expands upon elements akin to Broadband Consistent Quality, it uniquely includes assessments of initial connectivity and continuous completion of tasks, making it more comprehensive in scenarios involving multiple simultaneous connections.

Learn more

Definitions

Broadband Consistent Quality measures how often a network, from the perspective of a single device once connectivity is established, meets the requirements for common applications. Broadband Consistent Quality uses six key performance indicators: download and upload speeds, latency, jitter, packet loss, and time to first byte, setting thresholds appropriate for individual rather than multiple device usage. Metrics represent the percentage of users’ tests meeting these performance thresholds to support activities like watching HD video, completing group video calls, and gaming across all hours of the day.

Learn more

Definitions

Measured in Mbps, Broadband Download Speed represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across a provider’s network.

Learn more

Definitions

Measured in Mbps, Broadband Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds for each internet service provider observed by our users across their fixed networks. Typically, upload speeds are slower than download speeds, but this often depends on the technology used for broadband connections.

Learn more

Definitions

Opensignal’s adaptive video experience quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's network. The metric measures users’ adaptive video experience using a Mean Opinion Score (MOS) approach inspired by International Telecommunication Union (ITU) studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters of adaptive bitrate video streaming and the perceived video experience as reported by real people.

The videos tested are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers and include a wide selection of resolutions that dynamically match the network conditions, available bandwidth and device performance. Resolutions range from 144p to 2160p, which is also called 4K or UHD (Ultra High Definition). The model calculates a MOS score on a 0 to 100 scale by evaluating a number of parameters, including: the time to start playing the video, the quality of the video, the time playing each resolution, and the time spent re-buffering.

Learn more

City Fixed Broadband Experience

October 2025, Brazil Report
City
Reliability Experience
Consistent Quality
Download Speed
Upload Speed
Video Experience
Joint Winners Blink Telecom Nio Valenet
Winner Nio
Winner Vivo
Winner Valenet
Joint Winners Blink Telecom Claro Nio Vivo
Joint Winners Nio TIM
Joint Winners Giga+Fibra TIM
Joint Winners TIM Vivo
Joint Winners TIM Vivo
Joint Winners Allrede Claro Vivo
Winner Nio
Winner Nio
Winner Vivo
Winner Vivo
Joint Winners Claro Nio Vivo
Winner Brisanet
Winner Brisanet
Winner Vivo
Joint Winners Alares Brisanet Vivo
Joint Winners Alares Brisanet Claro Giga+Fibra Nio Vivo
Joint Winners Nio TIM
Joint Winners Nio TIM
Joint Winners Claro Nio TIM Vivo
Joint Winners Nio TIM
Joint Winners Claro TIM Vivo
Winner TIM
Winner TIM
Joint Winners TIM Vivo
Winner TIM
Joint Winners Amazonet Claro TIM Vivo
Joint Winners Brisanet TIM
Winner TIM
Joint Winners Claro TIM Vivo
Winner TIM
Joint Winners Brisanet Claro Nio TIM Vivo
Winner Nio
Winner Claro
Winner Vivo
Winner Vivo
Joint Winners Claro Vivo
Winner TIM
Winner TIM
Joint Winners TIM Vivo
Winner TIM
Joint Winners Claro TIM Vivo
Joint Winners TIM Vivo
Winner TIM
Winner Vivo
Winner Vivo
Joint Winners Claro TIM Vivo
Fixed Broadband Experience | October 2025 | © Opensignal Limited
Download Image

Selected region
  • A-I
    • Belo Horizonte
    • Brasília
    • Curitiba
    • Fortaleza
    • Goiânia
  • J-R
    • Manaus
    • Recife
    • Rio de Janeiro
  • S-Z
    • Salvador
    • São Paulo
Reliability Experience
in Belo Horizonte
100-1000 points
Nio
571
Blink Telecom
562
Valenet
553
Claro
535
Vivo
531
Algar Telecom
450
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in Belo Horizonte
% of tests
Nio
78.8
Claro
74.7
Valenet
70.8
Blink Telecom
70.8
Vivo
68.4
Algar Telecom
67.2
Download Image
Download Speed
in Belo Horizonte
in Mbps
Vivo
120.8
Valenet
108.4
Nio
103.2
Claro
97.6
Blink Telecom
91.1
Algar Telecom
65.0
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Belo Horizonte
in Mbps
Valenet
80.6
Vivo
70.2
Nio
65.4
Blink Telecom
58.9
Algar Telecom
40.9
Claro
27.5
Download Image
Video Experience
in Belo Horizonte
in 0-100 points
Blink Telecom
71.5
Nio
71.2
Claro
70.8
Vivo
70.7
Valenet
69.6
Algar Telecom
67.5
Download Image
Reliability Experience
in Brasília
100-1000 points
TIM
601
Nio
577
Vivo
567
Claro
562
Giga+Fibra
554
Allrede
551
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in Brasília
% of tests
TIM
77.9
Giga+Fibra
77.2
Claro
75.3
Vivo
75.0
Nio
74.5
Allrede
73.9
Download Image
Download Speed
in Brasília
in Mbps
Vivo
131.6
TIM
122.2
Nio
115.0
Claro
113.4
Allrede
87.5
Giga+Fibra
82.7
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Brasília
in Mbps
Vivo
73.2
TIM
68.8
Nio
58.5
Allrede
56.6
Giga+Fibra
55.2
Claro
38.5
Download Image
Video Experience
in Brasília
in 0-100 points
Vivo
72.1
Claro
71.8
Allrede
71.3
Nio
71.0
TIM
70.5
Giga+Fibra
70.0
Download Image
Reliability Experience
in Curitiba
100-1000 points
Nio
627
Claro
555
Vivo
548
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in Curitiba
% of tests
Nio
79.3
Claro
76.1
Vivo
70.0
Download Image
Download Speed
in Curitiba
in Mbps
Vivo
119.6
Nio
109.7
Claro
93.5
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Curitiba
in Mbps
Vivo
66.6
Nio
61.1
Claro
33.8
Download Image
Video Experience
in Curitiba
in 0-100 points
Vivo
71.7
Claro
71.7
Nio
71.5
Download Image
Reliability Experience
in Fortaleza
100-1000 points
Brisanet
543
Alares
505
Nio
493
Giga+Fibra
481
Claro
463
Vivo
428
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in Fortaleza
% of tests
Brisanet
74.6
Giga+Fibra
71.5
Nio
70.1
Vivo
64.6
Alares
64.5
Claro
62.6
Download Image
Download Speed
in Fortaleza
in Mbps
Vivo
94.7
Nio
81.7
Claro
81.1
Alares
78.1
Brisanet
73.5
Giga+Fibra
48.8
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Fortaleza
in Mbps
Brisanet
52.3
Alares
49.7
Vivo
48.4
Nio
44.2
Giga+Fibra
38.7
Claro
35.9
Download Image
Video Experience
in Fortaleza
in 0-100 points
Brisanet
69.8
Claro
69.5
Nio
69.3
Vivo
69.0
Alares
69.0
Giga+Fibra
68.8
Download Image
Reliability Experience
in Goiânia
100-1000 points
TIM
611
Nio
610
Claro
531
Vivo
522
LinQ Telecom
510
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in Goiânia
% of tests
Nio
79.0
TIM
78.8
Vivo
70.9
Claro
70.4
LinQ Telecom
54.0
Download Image
Download Speed
in Goiânia
in Mbps
TIM
118.1
Nio
112.7
Vivo
109.2
Claro
107.4
LinQ Telecom
104.7
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Goiânia
in Mbps
TIM
64.6
Nio
62.8
Vivo
56.5
LinQ Telecom
52.4
Claro
29.3
Download Image
Video Experience
in Goiânia
in 0-100 points
TIM
72.2
Vivo
71.0
Claro
71.0
Nio
70.8
LinQ Telecom
68.7
Download Image
Reliability Experience
in Manaus
100-1000 points
TIM
498
Nio
446
Claro
427
Amazonet
425
Vivo
424
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in Manaus
% of tests
TIM
72.4
Claro
66.0
Nio
65.4
Amazonet
63.2
Vivo
62.3
Download Image
Download Speed
in Manaus
in Mbps
Vivo
111.2
TIM
106.6
Nio
98.7
Claro
98.0
Amazonet
75.7
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Manaus
in Mbps
TIM
64.8
Vivo
52.8
Nio
52.5
Amazonet
42.6
Claro
24.7
Download Image
Video Experience
in Manaus
in 0-100 points
Amazonet
70.1
TIM
69.7
Vivo
69.4
Claro
69.0
Nio
67.8
Download Image
Reliability Experience
in Recife
100-1000 points
TIM
535
Brisanet
507
Nio
463
Claro
445
Vivo
431
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in Recife
% of tests
TIM
75.5
Brisanet
72.2
Nio
69.0
Vivo
64.6
Claro
59.7
Download Image
Download Speed
in Recife
in Mbps
TIM
106.5
Vivo
96.3
Claro
93.5
Nio
79.2
Brisanet
73.8
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Recife
in Mbps
TIM
74.9
Brisanet
50.1
Vivo
49.9
Nio
44.9
Claro
43.7
Download Image
Video Experience
in Recife
in 0-100 points
Brisanet
71.1
TIM
71.1
Vivo
69.4
Claro
69.1
Nio
68.9
Download Image
Reliability Experience
in Rio de Janeiro
100-1000 points
Nio
577
Claro
544
Vivo
519
TIM
499
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in Rio de Janeiro
% of tests
Claro
74.6
Nio
74.0
Vivo
71.3
TIM
68.3
Download Image
Download Speed
in Rio de Janeiro
in Mbps
Vivo
112.4
Nio
98.2
Claro
97.6
TIM
86.4
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Rio de Janeiro
in Mbps
Vivo
66.5
Nio
59.3
TIM
49.1
Claro
29.4
Download Image
Video Experience
in Rio de Janeiro
in 0-100 points
Claro
71.0
Vivo
70.7
Nio
70.3
TIM
69.4
Download Image
Reliability Experience
in Salvador
100-1000 points
TIM
533
Nio
482
Claro
472
Vivo
469
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in Salvador
% of tests
TIM
75.3
Nio
71.3
Claro
69.8
Vivo
67.5
Download Image
Download Speed
in Salvador
in Mbps
Vivo
99.4
TIM
96.8
Claro
85.4
Nio
78.2
Download Image
Upload Speed
in Salvador
in Mbps
TIM
63.8
Vivo
55.8
Nio
45.6
Claro
27.6
Download Image
Video Experience
in Salvador
in 0-100 points
TIM
70.6
Vivo
70.1
Claro
69.7
Nio
68.9
Download Image
Reliability Experience
in São Paulo
100-1000 points
Vivo
569
TIM
562
Claro
559
Giga+Fibra
557
Download Image
Consistent Quality
in São Paulo
% of tests
TIM
78.1
Claro
75.5
Vivo
74.4
Giga+Fibra
71.3
Download Image
Download Speed
in São Paulo
in Mbps
Vivo
120.2
Claro
99.6
TIM
85.1
Giga+Fibra
74.1
Download Image
Upload Speed
in São Paulo
in Mbps
Vivo
71.7
Giga+Fibra
54.5
TIM
50.8
Claro
33.2
Download Image
Video Experience
in São Paulo
in 0-100 points
Vivo
71.3
Claro
71.2
TIM
71.0
Giga+Fibra
70.5
Download Image

Related Analysis

Our Methodology

Collecting billions of individual measurements daily from over 100 million devices globally, Opensignal independently analyzes mobile and broadband user experience on every major network operator around the globe.

About Opensignal

Opensignal is the leading global provider of independent insights into consumers' connectivity experiences and choice of carrier. Our proprietary insights into mobile and broadband networks give operators the solutions they need to profitably compete and win, from executive level scorecards and public validation to pin-point level engineering analytics and consumer decision dynamics.

Check how your internet connection impacts your favorite apps with the Meteor App