Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Vodafone leads Germany’s fixed-line market on throughput and Reliability. Users on Vodafone are achieving an average Download Speed of 101.5Mbps and Upload Speed of 26.3Mbps — well ahead of users on major rival providers, in both measures. Users of Vodafone also have the best Reliability Experience. This reflects the strengths of Vodafone’s nationwide cable network. By contrast, the users on 1&1 network, which is xDSL/fiber based, have the best Consistent Quality and best Video Experience.
Upload Experience speeds across Germany’s four largest national fixed-line providers is modest, reflecting the country’s dependence on cable-based technology and slow transition to symmetrical full-fiber infrastructure. Users on Vodafone have the best upload speed, but the difference in upload speeds in the market is modest, led by Vodafone at 26.3Mbps and closely trailed with speeds of 20.9-23.2Mbps by major national competitors.
Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) is proving to be a strong complement to Germany’s evolving fiber landscape. Vodafone leads across all five FWA experience measures — Download (53.1Mbps), Upload (17.2Mbps), Reliability Experience (467 points), Video Experience (with ‘Very Good’ experience), and Consistent Quality (64.6% of tests passing quality thresholds) — sharing the latter award with 1&1. This points to FWA’s ability to deliver experience competitive with fixed-line networks in the country. 1&1 ranks second in most categories, or sharing equivalent experience with O2, that follows just behind.
1&1 leads in Germany for Consistent Quality, closely followed by O2, scoring 78.4% and 76.8% respectively at the national level. This measure reflects how reliably users experience smooth performance across everyday applications such as streaming, video calls, and web browsing. Across most regions, both providers deliver comparable results for Consistent Quality: 1&1 performs particularly well in Niedersachsen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, and the southern states, while O2 maintains wins outright or jointly across much of the national map. This near-parity in Consistent Quality underscores dependable network performance in latency, jitter, and packet-loss.
Germany’s FTTH-focused regional operators, notably Deutsche Glasfaser and PŸUR, stand tall and offer outright better experience across parts of the country. Deutsche Glasfaser leads Download Speed either outright or jointly in Hessen, Niedersachsen, Rheinland-Pfalz, Saarland, and Nordrhein-Westfalen, while PŸUR tops results in Berlin, Brandenburg, Sachsen and Sachsen-Anhalt. Reliability Experience closely mirrors these results, showing the advantages that full-fiber networks bring to households.
Vodafone continues to dominate throughput in western and northern Germany, topping Download Speed in Baden-Württemberg, Bremen, Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein, and Thüringen. Its DOCSIS 3.1 network delivers regional averages exceeding 100 Mbps. However, regional FTTH challengers are eroding this advantage in states like Hessen and Nordrhein-Westfalen.
Municipal and regional ISPs continue to set new performance standards in reliability and uplink capacity. Wilhelm.tel wins Reliability Experience outright in Hamburg and shares the winners’ podium with SWN in Schleswig-Holstein, achieving scores higher than any major national provider. In Upload Speed, local fiber cooperatives such as SWN and Vereinigte Stadtwerke in Schleswig-Holstein achieve exceptional results of 75–76 Mbps, vastly outperforming the national fixed-line average of 21–26 Mbps.
Germany’s fixed broadband market is Europe's largest, with 38.6 million connections at the end of 2024, according to the national regulator and a highly diverse infrastructure mix. Unlike fiber-heavy markets such as Spain or France, Germany’s gigabit coverage has historically been driven by upgraded HFC (hybrid fiber-coaxial) networks rather than full fiber-to-the-home/-building (FTTH/B).
Germany’s regulator reports that FTTH/B coverage is expanding rapidly, with footprint growing by around four million connections each year and reaching 36.8% of households by the end of 2024. However, the actual take-up still lags, with about one in four fibre-ready homes yet to activate a connection. More than three-quarters (76.5%) of German households had access to gigabit-capable broadband at the end of last year, but most of these were still delivered over upgraded cable networks rather than fibre. The regulator is advancing nationwide copper (xDSL) switch-off efforts, however, Germany remains some years away from a full phase-out comparable to Spain’s. Around 61% of fixed lines, or 23.6 million connections, continued to rely on various DSL technologies at the end of last year according to the regulator.
In terms of player composition, the market is concentrated around four national operators — Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone, 1&1, and O2 Telefónica — which together accounted for 81% of broadband lines as of March 2025, according to TeleGeography. Telekom operates the country’s largest fixed access footprint, spanning VDSL and an expanding FTTH rollout. Vodafone leads in high-speed coverage through its national HFC network, upgraded to DOCSIS 3.1 and progressively migrating to more modern, higher throughput standards. 1&1 offers copper and cable line from wholesale access agreements, with growing investment in its own FTTH deployments; while O2 primarily operates via wholesale-based agreements only, gaining large-scale access through its cable resale arrangement with Vodafone. The wholesale business plays a significant role in the xDSL/FTTx segment – while cable is mostly under Vodafone’s domain.
Beyond the national players, regional and alternative operators — including Deutsche Glasfaser, Tele Columbus (PŸUR), EWE, M-net, NetCologne, wilhelm.tel, SWN, and municipal networks — collectively serve around 19% of lines, historically acting as pioneers of pure FTTH access in their local markets.
In recent years, Germany’s fixed broadband market has been shaped by major infrastructure partnerships and open-access agreements rather than large-scale mergers. The Vodafone–Altice FibreCo joint venture aims to deploy FTTH connections to up to seven million homes, while Glasfaser NordWest — a partnership between Telekom and EWE — continues to expand fibre coverage across Germany’s northwest. Deutsche Glasfaser, the country’s largest independent fibre provider, has also accelerated rollout and wholesale cooperation, adding millions of premises through open-access deals. At the policy level, the federal government’s Gigabit Strategy 2030 seeks to align these investments by promoting duct and pole sharing, targeted subsidies for rural “white spots,” and a structured transition from copper to fibre infrastructure, to support nationwide gigabit connectivity.
Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) has emerged as a complementary broadband technology in Germany, helping operators extend high-speed coverage beyond the reach of fibre or cable networks. 1&1, Telekom Deutschland, and Telefónica (O2) have all introduced 5G-based home broadband offers, advertising speeds of up to 500Mbps. The providers are highlighting benefits for suburban and rural areas where fixed-line rollout remains limited, but are offering the service nationwide. Deutsche Telekom’s new Hybrid 5G offer combines fixed-line and mobile connectivity, supplementing DSL or fibre with 5G bandwidth for higher speeds — making it a hybrid rather than a fully wireless FWA solution.
For consumers, these developments mark a gradual market transformation towards step change in offered connectivity. Full-fibre networks now extend beyond major cities into smaller towns and rural districts, and users are gradually nudged to move from copper-based legacy connections.The growth in open-access agreements is fostering a more competitive environment, reducing barriers for smaller ISPs, and putting downward pressure on prices. As a result, consumers can expect faster, more resilient broadband, more choice in providers, and service standards in the future.
This report covers Germany’s main internet service providers, including the four national operators (Telekom, Vodafone, 1&1, and O2), as well as prominent regional and alternative providers such as Deutsche Glasfaser, Tele Columbus (PŸUR), EWE, M-net, NetCologne, wilhelm.tel, SWN, and other city and cooperative networks. Together, these operators represent the diverse mix of DSL, cable, and FTTH technologies that define Germany’s fixed-line broadband landscape.
We analyze real-world data from German fixed broadband users across five measures of user experience: Consistent Quality, Download Speed, Upload Speed, Video Experience, and Reliability Experience. These metrics capture the different ways households depend on broadband — from streaming and online gaming to hybrid work, education, and cloud services — reflecting both the strengths and regional diversity of Germany’s broadband networks.
We report on user experience according to the consumer-facing brand names that our users subscribe to. Plan characteristics — such as speed tiers or data caps — vary widely, and the distribution of plans influences average experience results. Our analysis reflects users’ actual experience, regardless of their subscribed plan, measured over a recent 90-day period in 2025.
Category description:
The experience of our users across wired methods of broadband access delivery i.e. Fiber, xDSL, Cable (HFC).
Broadband Consistent Quality measures how often a network, from the perspective of a single device once connectivity is established, meets the requirements for common applications. Broadband Consistent Quality uses six key performance indicators: download and upload speeds, latency, jitter, packet loss, and time to first byte, setting thresholds appropriate for individual rather than multiple device usage. Metrics represent the percentage of users’ tests meeting these performance thresholds to support activities like watching HD video, completing group video calls, and gaming across all hours of the day.
Measured in Mbps, Broadband Download Speed represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across a provider’s network.
Measured in Mbps, Broadband Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds for each internet service provider observed by our users across their fixed networks. Typically, upload speeds are slower than download speeds, but this often depends on the technology used for broadband connections.
Opensignal’s adaptive video experience quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's network. The metric measures users’ adaptive video experience using a Mean Opinion Score (MOS) approach inspired by International Telecommunication Union (ITU) studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters of adaptive bitrate video streaming and the perceived video experience as reported by real people.
The videos tested are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers and include a wide selection of resolutions that dynamically match the network conditions, available bandwidth and device performance. Resolutions range from 144p to 2160p, which is also called 4K or UHD (Ultra High Definition). The model calculates a MOS score on a 0 to 100 scale by evaluating a number of parameters, including: the time to start playing the video, the quality of the video, the time playing each resolution, and the time spent re-buffering.
Opensignal's Broadband Reliability Experience measures the ability of a household to connect to the internet and to successfully complete 'uninterrupted' tasks across multiple devices, encompassing work and recreational activities. While Reliability incorporates and expands upon elements akin to Broadband Consistent Quality, it uniquely includes assessments of initial connectivity and continuous completion of tasks, making it more comprehensive in scenarios involving multiple simultaneous connections.
Category description:
The experience of our users who are served by fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) where available from the provider, in comparison to other providers in the market.
Category description:
The experience of our users who are served by Fixed Wireless Access (FWA).
Broadband Consistent Quality measures how often a network, from the perspective of a single device once connectivity is established, meets the requirements for common applications. Broadband Consistent Quality uses six key performance indicators: download and upload speeds, latency, jitter, packet loss, and time to first byte, setting thresholds appropriate for individual rather than multiple device usage. Metrics represent the percentage of users’ tests meeting these performance thresholds to support activities like watching HD video, completing group video calls, and gaming across all hours of the day.
Measured in Mbps, Broadband Download Speed represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across a provider’s network.
Measured in Mbps, Broadband Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds for each internet service provider observed by our users across their fixed networks. Typically, upload speeds are slower than download speeds, but this often depends on the technology used for broadband connections.
Opensignal’s adaptive video experience quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's network. The metric measures users’ adaptive video experience using a Mean Opinion Score (MOS) approach inspired by International Telecommunication Union (ITU) studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters of adaptive bitrate video streaming and the perceived video experience as reported by real people.
The videos tested are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers and include a wide selection of resolutions that dynamically match the network conditions, available bandwidth and device performance. Resolutions range from 144p to 2160p, which is also called 4K or UHD (Ultra High Definition). The model calculates a MOS score on a 0 to 100 scale by evaluating a number of parameters, including: the time to start playing the video, the quality of the video, the time playing each resolution, and the time spent re-buffering.
Opensignal's Broadband Reliability Experience measures the ability of a household to connect to the internet and to successfully complete 'uninterrupted' tasks across multiple devices, encompassing work and recreational activities. While Reliability incorporates and expands upon elements akin to Broadband Consistent Quality, it uniquely includes assessments of initial connectivity and continuous completion of tasks, making it more comprehensive in scenarios involving multiple simultaneous connections.
Category description:
The experience of our users across wired methods of broadband access delivery i.e. Fiber, xDSL, Cable (HFC).
Category description:
The experience of our users who are served by fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) where available from the provider, in comparison to other providers in the market.
Category description:
The experience of our users who are served by Fixed Wireless Access (FWA).
Collecting billions of individual measurements daily from over 100 million devices globally, Opensignal independently analyzes mobile and broadband user experience on every major network operator around the globe.
Opensignal is the leading global provider of independent insights into consumers' connectivity experiences and choice of carrier. Our proprietary insights into mobile and broadband networks give operators the solutions they need to profitably compete and win, from executive level scorecards and public validation to pin-point level engineering analytics and consumer decision dynamics.
Journalists, please retain the Opensignal logo and copyright
(© Opensignal Limited) information when using this image.
This image may not be used for any commercial purpose, including use in advertisements or other promotional content, without prior written consent.
For every metric we calculate statistical confidence intervals indicated on our graphs. When confidence intervals overlap, our measured results are too close to declare a winner. In those cases, we show a statistical draw. For this reason, some metrics have multiple operator winners.
In our bar graphs we represent confidence intervals as boundaries on either sides of graph bars.
In our supporting-metric charts we show confidence intervals as +/- numerical values.
Why confidence intervals are vital in analyzing mobile network experience