Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
e& has once again solidified its position as the Best Network in the UAE, a testament to its consistent excellence in mobile connectivity. Furthermore, e& is the most awarded operator, sweeping an impressive 12 out of 13 categories.
du kept hold of its only award in Overall Availability, with a score of just 0.2 percentage points ahead of its rival’s 99.2%. Availability looks at the proportion of time our users spend with a 3G or better connection.
e& UAE once again claimed the Consistent Quality award with a score of 66%, a notable 12.4 percentage points higher than its rival, du. This indicates that e& users consistently experience a greater proportion of tests meeting the necessary thresholds for demanding mobile applications, such as high-quality video calls or smooth image uploads to social media. Furthermore, e& UAE maintained its top position for Reliability Experience, scoring an impressive 879 points on a 100-1000 point scale. This highlights the network's strong ability to connect users and successfully complete essential tasks, ensuring a dependable mobile experience.
Our latest analysis of the mobile network experience in the United Arab Emirates reveals that e& remains the frontrunner for our users’ overall and 5G experience, offering a better experience than its key rival du across almost all of our metrics. e& wins 12 out of our 13 national awards in the UAE – the same result as in our last report – including all the overall and 5G speed awards, Consistent Quality, and Coverage Experience. du wins a single award for Availability, but with both scores over 99% there is very little light between the UAE’s two operators in this category.
In order to bolster its 5G network performance, e& recently has signed a three-year 5G deal with Ericsson in the UAE to expand its 5G radio access network (RAN), boost network capacity and extend 5G availability (including the introduction of 5G-Advanced). e& has also begun testing 5G technology in the 600MHz and 6GHz bands. The lower band spectrum has shown improved propagation beyond 6km, while the upper mid-band has achieved download rates of up to 10Gbps.
In May 2025, e& UAE implemented a 5G network slicing solution for enterprise customers, dubbed to be the first one of its kind in the region. This enables tailored, ultra-reliable 5G connectivity designed to meet the evolving needs of industries and organizations across both public and private sectors, such as smart manufacturing, logistics, energy, and critical communications, and to support digital transformation goals under “We the UAE 2031” vision. The deployment builds on e&’s 5G journey, which began with the launch of 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) in 2019, followed by its transition to 5G SA in 2023.
For its part, du recently launched 5G-Advanced on its commercial network using mid-band spectrum (2.6GHz and 6GHz), achieving similar peak download speeds to e&. 5G-Advanced should allow both the UAE’s operators to extend 5G coverage to areas with previously weak or inconsistent service, while improving speeds and lowering latency.
Mid-band spectrum in the 2.6GHz and 3.5GHz band has become the foundation for 5G across much of the GCC – and the rapid allocation higher mid-band 6GHz bandwidth by the regulator will undoubtedly boost 5G performance. The UAE sunsetted its 2G networks by the end of 2023 – and the country’s operators must now work to reallocate this lower band spectrum to extend 5G usage to boost rural availability, improving overall connectivity and user experience.
In this report, we examine the mobile network experience of the two main mobile network operators in the United Arab Emirates — du and e& UAE — over a period of 90 days starting on April 01, 2025, and ending on June 30, 2025, to see how they fared.
e& UAE kept hold of this award with a score of 64.4 points – a lead of three points over rival du. e& and du's scores haven't significantly changed since the previous report.
Both operators place in the Good (58-68) category.
A Good (58-68) rating means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at 720p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling.
Video Experience scores account for adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR), a technology that allows Opensignal to accurately represent users' real video experience including video streams up to 4K quality.
Opensignal’s Video Experience quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's networks. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate video experience, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the overall video experience for each operator on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
In addition to Video Experience, we report on the following metrics related to video experience:
e& keeps the Games Experience award, winning outright with a score of 76.7 points – a lead of three points over du. Both operator’s scores increased by around two points.
E& uae places in the Good (75-85) category, while du places one category lower, in Fair (65-75).
A Good (75-85) rating means that most users deem the experience acceptable. The gameplay experience is generally controllable and the user receives immediate feedback between their actions and the outcomes in the game. Most users do not experience a delay between their actions and the game. A Fair (65-75) rating means that users find the experience to be ‘average’. In most cases the game is responsive to the actions of the player with most users feeling like they have control over the game. The majority of players notice a delay between their actions and the outcomes in the game.
Opensignal’s Games Experience measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator’s network. Measured on a scale of 0-100, it analyzes how our users’ multiplayer mobile gaming experience is affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter.
Games Experience quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world.
Calculating Games Experience starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users’ devices to internet end-points that host real games. The score is then measured on a scale from 0 to 100.
In addition to Games Experience, we report on the following metrics related to games experience:
e& wins the Download Speed Experience award for the second report in a row, with a score of 56.2Mbps – a lead of 13Mbps over rival du. e&’s score increased by 5Mbps, while du's score grew by 2Mbps.
Measured in Mbps, Download Speed Experience represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across an operator’s mobile data networks.
In addition to Download Speed Experience, we report on the following metrics related to download speeds:
e& kept hold of the Upload Speed Experience award with a score of 11.6Mbps, a lead of 2Mbps over rival du. Neither operator saw any statistically significant change in their scores since the last report.
Upload Speed Experience measures the average upload speeds for each operator observed by our users across their mobile data networks. Typically upload speeds are slower than download speeds, as current mobile broadband technologies focus resources on providing the best possible download speed for users consuming content on their devices. As mobile internet trends move away from downloading content to creating content and supporting real-time communications services, upload speeds are becoming more vital and new technologies are emerging that boost upstream capacity.
In addition to Upload Speed Experience, we report on five supporting metrics related to upload speeds:
e& once again wins the 5G Video Experience award outright with a score of just under 70 points – a lead of just two points over du. However both operators saw their scores drop by one point.
E& uae places in the Very Good (68-78) category, while du places one category lower, in Good (58-68).
A Very Good (68-78) rating means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at 1080p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling. A Good (58-68) rating means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at 720p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling.
5G Video Experience scores account for adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR), a technology that allows Opensignal to accurately represent users' real video experience including video streams up to 4K quality.
5G Video Experience quantifies the quality of mobile video experienced by Opensignal users on real-world video streams when they were connected to 5G. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate 5G Video Experience, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the video experience observed by our users on each operator’s 5G network on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
e& wins the 5G Games Experience award, the same result as in the last report. The operator scored 84.6 points, meaning a lead of four points over second-placed du. There were no significant changes in either operators’ score since the last report.
Both operators place in the Good (75-85) category.
A Good (75-85) rating means that most users deem the experience acceptable. The gameplay experience is generally controllable and the user receives immediate feedback between their actions and the outcomes in the game. Most users do not experience a delay between their actions and the game.
5G Games Experience measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator's 5G network. It analyzes how our users’ multiplayer mobile gaming experience was affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter. 5G Games Experience for each operator is calculated on a scale from 0 to 100.
5G Games Experience quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world. Calculating 5G Games Experience starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users’ devices to internet end-points that host real games.
The 5G Download Speed award was won again by e& with a score of 272Mbps – a lead of 50Mbps over rival du. Du’s score fell by 26Mbps since our last report, while e&’s score remains statistically unchanged.
5G Download Speed shows the average download speed experienced by Opensignal users across an operator’s 5G network. 5G Download Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
e& keeps hold of the 5G Upload Speed award with a score of 28.1Mbps, a lead of 6Mbps over rival du.
5G Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds experienced by Opensignal users across an operator’s 5G network. 5G Upload Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
e& retained the Coverage Experience award with a score of 9.1 points on a 10-point scale – a lead of two points over key rival du. Neither operator saw its scores change a significant amount since the previous report.
The Opensignal Coverage Experience metric measures the extent of mobile networks in the places people live, work and travel. The metric represents the experience users receive as they travel around areas where they would reasonably expect to find coverage.
Traditional coverage metrics typically estimate either a percentage of land area covered, or a percentage of population covered; often neither will be an accurate measurement of the true user expectation and experience. In many markets there are areas where neither population density nor geographic area reflect the importance of coverage to users. For example, in a large mountain range most users will not expect coverage in the wilderness, but poor coverage in the relatively small area of a ski resort is critical for the enjoyment of a holiday. Estimates based purely on population give undue significance to coverage in the most densely populated areas.
Coverage Experience measures geographic coverage of populated areas and therefore more accurately reflects the coverage expectations and experience of typical users. It can give a result that is somewhat different to traditional estimates based on either geographic or population measures. The metric uses a scale from 0 to 10.
e& kept hold of the 5G Coverage Experience award with a score of 5.4 points on a 10-point scale – a lead of one point over second-placed du. Both operators saw their scores increase by less than one point.
The Opensignal Coverage Experience metric measures the extent of mobile networks in the places people live, work and travel. The metric represents the experience users receive as they travel around areas where they would reasonably expect to find coverage.
Traditional coverage metrics typically estimate either a percentage of land area covered, or a percentage of population covered; often neither will be an accurate measurement of the true user expectation and experience. In many markets there are areas where neither population density nor geographic area reflect the importance of coverage to users. For example, in a large mountain range most users will not expect coverage in the wilderness, but poor coverage in the relatively small area of a ski resort is critical for the enjoyment of a holiday. Estimates based purely on population give undue significance to coverage in the most densely populated areas.
Coverage Experience measures geographic coverage of populated areas and therefore more accurately reflects the coverage expectations and experience of typical users. It can give a result that is somewhat different to traditional estimates based on either geographic or population measures. The metric uses a scale from 0 to 10.
5G Coverage Experience shows the proportion of places Opensignal users with a 5G device and a 5G subscription had an active 5G connection.
Du wins the Availability award outright for the second report in a row, with a score of 99.4% – a lead of less than one percentage point over e&. Neither scores saw a significant change since the previous report.
Our availability metrics are not a measure of a network’s geographical extent. They won’t tell you whether you are likely to get a signal if you plan to visit a remote rural or nearly uninhabited region. Instead, they measure what proportion of time people have a network connection, in the places they most commonly frequent — something often missed by traditional coverage metrics. Looking at when users have a connection rather than where, provides us with a more precise reflection of the true user experience.
We also keep track of the instances that leave mobile users most frustrated: when there is no signal to connect to at all. The most common dead zones users struggle with occur indoors. As most of our availability data is collected indoors (as that’s where users spend most of their time), we’re particularly astute at detecting areas of zero signal.
Our availability metrics take a user-centric, time-based approach that complements the user-centric and geographical-based methodology used by our reach metrics.
Availability shows the proportion of time all Opensignal users on an operator’s network had either a 3G, 4G or 5G connection.
e& once again wins the Consistent Quality award with a score of 66% – a lead of 12 percentage points over rival du. However, du's score has decreased by two percentage points since our last report, while e&’s score has fallen by one percentage point.
This metric measures if the network is sufficient to support common mobile application requirements at a level that is ‘good enough’ for users to maintain (or complete) various typical demanding tasks on their devices. It assesses a number of experience indicators such as download speed, upload speed, latency, jitter, packet loss, and time to first byte.
Consistent Quality measures if the network is sufficient to support common mobile application requirements at a level that is ‘good enough’ for users to maintain (or complete) various typical tasks on their devices.
We combine different experience indicators such as download throughput, upload throughput, latency, jitter, packet discard, and time to first byte to calculate Consistent Quality. These components are evaluated against thresholds recommended by various more demanding common applications used for a range of common tasks.
To calculate the metric value, the proportion of tests that pass the requirements of Consistent Quality is multiplied by the test success ratio, which is the proportion of completed tests to all tests conducted. Tests that pass indicate that activities such as video calling, uploading an image to social media, or using smart home applications will be possible without noticeable lag or slowdown.
e& kept hold of the Reliability Experience award with a score of 879 points on a 100-1000 point scale, a lead of 59 points over key rival du. Neither operator saw its scores change a significant amount since the previous report.
Opensignal’s Reliability Experience measures the ability of our users to connect to and successfully complete (basic) tasks on operators’ networks. It consists of the following components:
% time connected — The proportion of time Opensignal users can successfully connect to a mobile network
Data Connectivity — the proportion of time when the network is available and the device can connect to the internet
Task completion — whether tasks initiated by the user’s device are completed
Sufficiency — The probability that (basic) tasks will be executed sufficiently well for the user
Opensignal’s Reliability Experience measures the ability of Opensignal users to connect to and successfully complete (basic) tasks on communication service providers’ (CSP) networks. It analyzes how much Opensignal users’ experience is affected by the radio access and core network, along with issues that prevent them from connecting to the internet even if they have a connection to their CSP’s network. It also factors in users’ ability to successfully use lower performance applications including SD video, over-the-top voice calls and web browsing.
Collecting billions of individual measurements daily from over 100 million devices globally, Opensignal independently analyzes mobile and broadband user experience on every major network operator around the globe.
Opensignal is the leading global provider of independent insights into consumers' connectivity experiences and choice of carrier. Our proprietary insights into mobile and broadband networks give operators the solutions they need to profitably compete and win, from executive level scorecards and public validation to pin-point level engineering analytics and consumer decision dynamics.
Journalists, please retain the Opensignal logo and copyright
(© Opensignal Limited) information when using this image.
This image may not be used for any commercial purpose, including use in advertisements or other promotional content, without prior written consent.
For every metric we calculate statistical confidence intervals indicated on our graphs. When confidence intervals overlap, our measured results are too close to declare a winner. In those cases, we show a statistical draw. For this reason, some metrics have multiple operator winners.
In our bar graphs we represent confidence intervals as boundaries on either sides of graph bars.
In our supporting-metric charts we show confidence intervals as +/- numerical values.
Why confidence intervals are vital in analyzing mobile network experience