Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Bell wins for Reliability with a score of 789 on a 100-1000 point scale, ahead of Rogers (776) and TELUS (756). Reliability measures the ability of a household to successfully connect to the internet, and complete a range of tasks across multiple devices.
Rogers takes the lead for Download Speed with a result of 270.0Mbps. This places it over 27Mbps ahead of second-placed Bell, which scores 242.7Mbps, while TELUS comes third with 202.1Mbps.
Our users on Bell see the highest average upload speeds, with a result of 173.1Mbps. It has a significant lead over second-placed TELUS at 127.0Mbps, and more than double the result of Rogers (83.0Mbps). Bell also wins for Consistent Quality at 88.2%. Consistent Quality measures how often a connection meets the minimum performance thresholds for a range of common applications, from the perspective of a single user.
Rogers leads for Video with a score of 78.5 points on a 100-point scale, narrowly ahead of joint-second TELUS and Bell at 78.3. All providers land in the “Excellent” category, meaning that our users were, on average, able to stream video at 1080p or better with fast loading times and no stalling.
Bell stands alone on the podium for each of our metrics in Quebec. Its lead on Download Speed is particularly notable, at 263.8Mbps, 21Mbps faster than its national result and 65Mbps faster than Quebec’s second-place finish from TELUS.
TELUS takes home three awards in its home province of British Columbia. It wins for Upload Speed outright, and then ties with Rogers for Video and Reliability. It also picks up a further win for Upload Speed in Alberta.
Rogers picks up 23 wins out of the 35 total awards available at a regional level. It achieves at least one win in every region except Quebec, where it has a smaller presence and is not included in our comparisons.
Eastlink picks up three awards in Ontario (Reliability, Consistent Quality and Video), and a further two in the Atlantic provinces (Consistent Quality, Video). All of these awards are won jointly with at least one additional provider. This demonstrates the competitiveness of regional players as a high quality option for consumers.
Canada's fixed broadband market is mature, and growth is slow. Canada's telecommunications regulator, the CRTC, reported a 2.4% increase in retail subscribers between 2023 and 2024 in its 2026 Canadian Telecommunications Market Report. Access is also nearly ubiquitous. The CRTC has a target of 50Mbps download speed, 10Mbps upload speed connectivity for 100% of Canadians by 2030, with Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED, the federal department responsible for economic innovation) reporting that the program is “on track to connecting 98% of Canadians by 2026”. In our experienced speeds tiers research, we see Canada place second behind the United States for the proportion of subscribers whose connections deliver over 30Mbps (94%), 100Mbps (66%) and over 250Mbps (47%).
Regulation is also focused on delivering more affordable and competitive internet access by opening up wholesale access to fibre networks, something Bell and TELUS now use to offer service beyond their existing fixed broadband footprint. The policy and subsequent rate confirmation received mixed reviews from within the industry, with smaller providers who utilize wholesale agreements, like TekSavvy, suggesting the rates were still high, and that wholesale legislation did not go far enough to meaningfully drive up competition – while other industry bodies suggest the plans disincentivises network building – and that the risk of building out fibre networks is now no longer mitigated by the competitive advantage it would provide. The debate reflects a core regulatory tension between expanding consumer choice and sustaining a viable telecoms industry.
Meanwhile alternative connectivity is gaining a foothold in Canada. As our recent global Starlink analysis showed, the satellite broadband provider has significantly grown its win share (share of wins among subscribers switching their ISP), in both urban and rural areas in Canada. This comes alongside gains in its Reliability result in our reporting. However, it still remains a smaller player in the market, with a market share of about 3% in Opensignal data. Due to its smaller size, Starlink is not included in this report.
At the federal level, appetite runs towards a sovereign alternative. Prime Minister Carney has promoted Telesat Lightspeed as Canada’s answer to Starlink. Telesat Lightspeed has yet to launch service for consumers, though it plans to launch its first two production satellites in December 2026, ramping up towards its 156 satellite initial goal through 2027.
Canadian operators are also planning to invest less in networks. While part of this is a natural ebb in investment as operators reach the end of their fibre rollout plans, operators also cite regulatory pressures, and the need for government policies that favour competition, as barriers to further spend. In a low growth market, where competition is driving down pricing, and network differentiation is being undermined by declining CAPEX, the quality of user experience is therefore one of the few remaining levers for winning and keeping subscribers.
This report covers Canada’s main internet service providers – Rogers, Bell and TELUS. We then include prominent regional providers in our regional breakdowns, where they offer significant coverage and a representative subscriber market share. These are Access Communications, Cogeco, EastLink, Purple Cow Internet, SaskTel, TekSavvy Solutions, Valley Fiber, Videotron, Westman Communications Group, and Xplore.
We analyze the real-world fixed broadband experience of our users across Canada, focused on five aspects of user experience: Consistent Quality, Download Speed, Upload Speed, Video, and Reliability. Together, these metrics capture the many ways households rely on broadband, from remote work and education to video streaming and gaming.
We report using consumer-facing brand names. Plan characteristics -- such as speed tiers or data caps -- vary widely, and the distribution of plans influences average experience results. Our analysis reflects users' actual experience, regardless of their subscribed plan, measured over a 90-day period starting February 1, 2026.
Opensignal's Broadband Reliability Experience measures the ability of a household to connect to the internet and to successfully complete 'uninterrupted' tasks across multiple devices, encompassing work and recreational activities. While Reliability incorporates and expands upon elements akin to Broadband Consistent Quality, it uniquely includes assessments of initial connectivity and continuous completion of tasks, making it more comprehensive in scenarios involving multiple simultaneous connections.
Broadband Consistent Quality measures how often a network, from the perspective of a single device once connectivity is established, meets the requirements for common applications. Broadband Consistent Quality uses six key performance indicators: download and upload speeds, latency, jitter, packet loss, and time to first byte, setting thresholds appropriate for individual rather than multiple device usage. Metrics represent the percentage of users’ tests meeting these performance thresholds to support activities like watching HD video, completing group video calls, and gaming across all hours of the day.
Measured in Mbps, Broadband Download Speed represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across a provider’s network.
Measured in Mbps, Broadband Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds for each internet service provider observed by our users across their fixed networks. Typically, upload speeds are slower than download speeds, but this often depends on the technology used for broadband connections.
Opensignal’s adaptive video experience quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's network. The metric measures users’ adaptive video experience using a Mean Opinion Score (MOS) approach inspired by International Telecommunication Union (ITU) studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters of adaptive bitrate video streaming and the perceived video experience as reported by real people.
The videos tested are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers and include a wide selection of resolutions that dynamically match the network conditions, available bandwidth and device performance. Resolutions range from 144p to 2160p, which is also called 4K or UHD (Ultra High Definition). The model calculates a MOS score on a 0 to 100 scale by evaluating a number of parameters, including: the time to start playing the video, the quality of the video, the time playing each resolution, and the time spent re-buffering.
Collecting billions of individual measurements daily from over 100 million devices globally, Opensignal independently analyzes mobile and broadband user experience on every major network operator around the globe.
Opensignal is the leading global provider of independent insights into consumers' connectivity experiences and choice of carrier. Our proprietary insights into mobile and broadband networks give operators the solutions they need to profitably compete and win, from executive level scorecards and public validation to pin-point level engineering analytics and consumer decision dynamics.
Journalists, please retain the Opensignal logo and copyright
(© Opensignal Limited) information when using this image.
This image may not be used for any commercial purpose, including use in advertisements or other promotional content, without prior written consent.
For every metric we calculate statistical confidence intervals indicated on our graphs. When confidence intervals overlap, our measured results are too close to declare a winner. In those cases, we show a statistical draw. For this reason, some metrics have multiple operator winners.
In our bar graphs we represent confidence intervals as boundaries on either sides of graph bars.
In our supporting-metric charts we show confidence intervals as +/- numerical values.
Why confidence intervals are vital in analyzing mobile network experience