Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
T-Mobile wins 12 of a possible 16 awards in this latest report — retaining all its wins from our previous report back in January. It sweeps the Network Performance and Quality of Experience categories, with a particularly strong win for overall Download Speed, where it leads the competition by nearly 97Mbps.
Once again, T-Mobile wins in both metrics representing overall quality of experience in our reports — Reliability and Consistent Quality. Each metric represents a slightly different aspect of this experience; Reliability shows the full connectivity experience including establishing a connection, and then being able to complete a range of basic tasks. Meanwhile Consistent Quality shows how often a user has a network experience good enough for a range of typical demanding tasks, once a connection has been established.
Verizon maintains its Coverage award win with a score of 9.7 on a ten point scale. AT&T and T-Mobile have both improved slightly to narrow the gap, but Verizon remains the frontrunner in our metric on the extent of mobile networks in the places users would reasonably expect to find coverage.
AT&T scores 99.6% to retain its top spot for Time on Network from the last report. However, the lead is narrow — Verizon remains just behind at 99.5%, while T-Mobile has slightly improved to 99.2%, indicating just how close to ubiquitous connectivity is in the U.S.
Verizon takes the top spot across both 5G Video and 5G Live Video, meaning its users are, on average, getting the best quality of video streaming. However it's a close field, and for both metrics less than a point separates first and third place.
AT&T shows improvement in 5G download speeds, which also drives gains in our overall Download Speed results. Its scores improved by 39Mbps and 21Mbps respectively. While it remains in second place for both metrics, these gains begin to close the gap between it and first-placed T-Mobile.
June 2026 marked the culmination of months, if not years, of planning for the FIFA World Cup. High-density events like this are where network congestion becomes most visible to users – not just at the event, but throughout their whole visit. As such, preparedness has to cover both the venues themselves, and the host cities where fans visit and stay before and after matches.
As the official telecommunication services sponsor of the event, Verizon's investments were broad. At event venues, Verizon deployed private 5G and FWA to support logistics like broadcast and retail operations. It also invested in local communities around the stadiums. However, all operators had to prepare for the increased traffic. AT&T launched its Turbo Live service in January as a premium offering to avoid congestion at live events and introduced a World Cup eSIM for visiting fans. Meanwhile, T-Mobile deployed its new Dynamic CX capabilities on its AI-powered Self-Organizing Network. These are designed to plan for and optimize network performance during large-scale events. It also promoted its T-Priority service for first responders.
Ensuring capacity for future network demands is critical. To that end, in June 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) held the first U.S. spectrum auction in four years. This was a re-auction of mid-band spectrum, primarily licenses previously held by Dish. Verizon emerged as the top spender. It picked up licenses for denser urban markets. T-Mobile added the most licenses, with more of a focus on rural markets.
Both operators' acquisitions align with their relative opportunities for growth in our reporting. T-Mobile has a lower Coverage Experience score than other operators, so more spectrum in rural areas may help it extend service. However, T-Mobile leads across our experience and network performance categories. This performance advantage begins with its strong mid-band spectrum holdings and broad 5G deployment, but is aided by its investments in technologies like its AI-powered Self-Organizing Network. Here, Verizon's new urban spectrum, along with its own investments in AI-powered network technology, could help close the gap.
AT&T's auction spend was much more moderate. It purchased and deployed nationwide mid- and low-band spectrum from EchoStar in 2025. In this latest report we can see notable improvements in AT&T's speed results. The additional spectrum appears to have bolstered its 5G performance, and AT&T records a 39Mbps improvement in 5G Download Speed (as well as a 21Mbps improvement in overall Download Speed). This makes it the operator with the largest increase in both of these metrics.
Starlink also attracted significant attention at the auction, eventually purchasing just two licenses. This was amid speculation that it may be considering launching a consumer service. For this, it would need considerably more spectrum. Starlink purchased 50MHz of spectrum from EchoStar in September 2025 (and an additional 15Mhz in November), but still holds far less than the three major U.S. carriers. Its next opportunity to acquire significant quantities of U.S. spectrum is the upper C-Band auction, due by July 2027. However, it will be several years before Starlink, or anyone else, can deploy this spectrum. This is due to the need for incumbents to migrate off the spectrum, and FAA-mandated upgrades to aircraft radio altimeters to mitigate potential interference.
Starlink's direct to device (D2D) service is currently available to consumers via T-Mobile, and is primarily for emergency connectivity. This is for areas where terrestrial coverage is not available, such as coverage holes or during outages. Looking ahead, the major U.S. carriers are defining their role in the D2D ecosystem through a new joint venture. This will allow them to pool resources, mostly spectrum, to add network redundancy and encourage satellite innovation. All of this aims to provide ubiquitous, reliable service to consumers.
In this report we examine the current mobile network experience of the three main mobile network operators in the U.S. — AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon — over a period of 90 days starting on April 1, 2026, and ending on June 29, 2026, to see how they fared. This report includes updated category names for clarity and simplicity, with no change to our metrics or underlying methodology.
T-Mobile users in our panel have the most reliable network experience, and T-Mobile wins the Reliability award outright with 942 points on a 100–1000 scale. AT&T places a close second on 939 points, three points behind T-Mobile, while Verizon is third with 932 points.
Reliability measures the ability of Opensignal users to connect to and successfully complete (basic) tasks on communication service providers' (CSP) networks. It analyzes how much Opensignal users' experience is affected by the radio access and core network, along with issues that prevent them from connecting to the internet even if they have a connection to their CSP's network. It also factors in users' ability to successfully use lower performance applications including SD video, over-the-top voice calls and web browsing.
Our users on T-Mobile most often get a network experience good enough for a range of common, but demanding, use cases. As a result, T-Mobile wins for Consistent Quality, scoring 82.8%. Second-placed Verizon is on 80.4%, while AT&T ranks third with 79.4%.
Consistent Quality measures if the network is sufficient to support common mobile application requirements at a level that is 'good enough' for users to maintain (or complete) various typical tasks on their devices.
We combine different experience indicators such as download throughput, upload throughput, latency, jitter, packet discard, and time to first byte to calculate Consistent Quality. These components are evaluated against thresholds recommended by various more demanding common applications used for a range of common tasks.
To calculate the metric value, the proportion of tests that pass the requirements of Consistent Quality is multiplied by the test success ratio, which is the proportion of completed tests to all tests conducted. Tests that pass indicate that activities such as video calling, uploading an image to social media, or using smart home applications will be possible without noticeable lag or slowdown.
Our users on T-Mobile get the fastest download speeds, meaning T-Mobile wins the Download Speed award outright with 192.5Mbps. That puts it nearly 97Mbps ahead of second-placed AT&T on 96.0Mbps, while Verizon ranks third with 89.4Mbps.
Since the last report, AT&T's score has increased by 21Mbps, Verizon's by 16Mbps, and T-Mobile's by 8Mbps.
Measured in Mbps, Download Speed represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across an operator's mobile data networks.
T-Mobile also wins for the fastest 5G download speeds, with 247.4Mbps. AT&T places second on 223.5Mbps, 24Mbps behind T-Mobile, while Verizon is third with 179.2Mbps.
Since the last report, AT&T has improved by 39Mbps and Verizon by 3Mbps, while T-Mobile's score has fallen slightly by 2Mbps.
5G Download Speed shows the average download speed experienced by Opensignal users across an operator's 5G network. 5G Download Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
T-Mobile users in our panel get the fastest upload speeds, winning T-Mobile the Upload Speed award outright with 16.0Mbps. Verizon places second on 10.9Mbps, 5Mbps behind T-Mobile, while AT&T is third with 9.5Mbps.
Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds for each operator observed by our users across their mobile data networks. Typically upload speeds are slower than download speeds, as current mobile broadband technologies focus resources on providing the best possible download speed for users consuming content on their devices. As mobile internet trends move away from downloading content to creating content and supporting real-time communications services, upload speeds are becoming more vital and new technologies are emerging that boost upstream capacity.
T-Mobile wins the 5G Upload award outright, at 19.2Mbps. Verizon places second on 17.9Mbps, 1Mbps behind T-Mobile, while AT&T is third with 16.6Mbps.
5G Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds experienced by Opensignal users across an operator's 5G network. 5G Upload Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
Verizon leads for coverage experience in this report, winning the Coverage award outright with a score of 9.7 points on a 10-point scale. It leads second-placed AT&T by less than one point, while T-Mobile places third with 9.1 points.
Coverage measures the extent of mobile networks in the places people live, work and travel. The metric represents the experience users receive as they travel around areas where they would reasonably expect to find coverage.
Traditional coverage metrics typically estimate either a percentage of land area covered, or a percentage of population covered; often neither will be an accurate measurement of the true user expectation and experience. In many markets there are areas where neither population density nor geographic area reflect the importance of coverage to users. For example, in a large mountain range most users will not expect coverage in the wilderness, but poor coverage in the relatively small area of a ski resort is critical for the enjoyment of a holiday. Estimates based purely on population give undue significance to coverage in the most densely populated areas.
Coverage measures geographic coverage of populated areas and therefore more accurately reflects the coverage expectations and experience of typical users. It can give a result that is somewhat different to traditional estimates based on either geographic or population measures. The metric uses a scale from 0 to 10.
T-Mobile wins the 5G Coverage award outright with a score of 8.5 points on a 10-point scale. Verizon places second on 8.1 points, less than one point behind, while AT&T is third with 7.7 points.
5G Coverage measures the extent of mobile networks in the places people live, work and travel. The metric represents the 5G experience users receive as they travel around areas where they would reasonably expect to find coverage.
Traditional coverage metrics typically estimate either a percentage of land area covered, or a percentage of population covered; often neither will be an accurate measurement of the true user expectation and experience. In many markets there are areas where neither population density nor geographic area reflect the importance of coverage to users. For example, in a large mountain range most users will not expect coverage in the wilderness, but poor coverage in the relatively small area of a ski resort is critical for the enjoyment of a holiday. Estimates based purely on population give undue significance to coverage in the most densely populated areas.
Coverage measures geographic coverage of populated areas and therefore more accurately reflects the coverage expectations and experience of typical users. It can give a result that is somewhat different to traditional estimates based on either geographic or population measures. The metric uses a scale from 0 to 10.
5G Coverage shows the proportion of places Opensignal users with a 5G device and a 5G subscription had an active 5G connection.
AT&T users in our panel are spending the most time connected, meaning AT&T wins the Time on Network award outright with a score of 99.6%. However, it's a close field, and AT&T is less than one percentage point ahead of second-placed Verizon or third-placed T-Mobile.
Time on Network metrics are not measures of a network’s geographical extent. They won’t tell you whether you are likely to get a signal if you plan to visit a remote rural or nearly uninhabited region. Instead, they measure what proportion of time people have a network connection, in the places they most commonly frequent — something often missed by traditional coverage metrics. Looking at when users have a connection rather than where, provides us with a more precise reflection of the true user experience.
We also keep track of the instances that leave mobile users most frustrated: when there is no signal to connect to at all. The most common dead zones users struggle with occur indoors. As most of our time on network data is collected indoors (as that’s where users spend most of their time), we’re particularly astute at detecting areas of zero signal.
Our time on network and availability metrics take a user-centric, time-based approach that complements the user-centric and geographical-based methodology used by our reach metrics.
Time on Network shows the proportion of time all Opensignal users on an operator’s network had either a 3G, 4G or 5G connection.
Our users on T-Mobile spend the most time with access to a 5G connection, and T-Mobile achieves a score of 91.8% and the win for 5G Availability. It has a two percentage point lead over second-placed AT&T's 89.8%. Verizon places third with 66.6%. However, Verizon is starting to close the gap, and has increased its score by seven percentage points since the last report.
Our Time on Network & Availability metrics are not measures of a network’s geographical extent. They won’t tell you whether you are likely to get a signal if you plan to visit a remote rural or nearly uninhabited region. Instead, they measure what proportion of time people have a network connection, in the places they most commonly frequent — something often missed by traditional coverage metrics. Looking at when users have a connection rather than where, provides us with a more precise reflection of the true user experience.
We also keep track of the instances that leave mobile users most frustrated: when there is no signal to connect to at all. The most common dead zones users struggle with occur indoors. As most of our time on network data is collected indoors (as that’s where users spend most of their time), we’re particularly astute at detecting areas of zero signal.
Our time on network and availability metrics take a user-centric, time-based approach that complements the user-centric and geographical-based methodology used by our reach metrics.
5G Availability shows the proportion of time Opensignal users with a 5G device and a 5G subscription had a 5G connection, whether or not it was used.
T-Mobile scores a first place result for the best mobile video experience in this report, winning the Video award outright with 73.0 points on a 100-point scale. AT&T is close behind in second on 72.0 points, while Verizon places third with 71.4. All three operators fall into the Very Good (68-78) category, which means users are, on average, able to stream video at 1080p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling.
Video quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's networks. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate video experience, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the overall video experience for each operator on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world's largest video content providers.
Verizon continues to place first for the best 5G mobile video experience, winning the 5G Video award outright with a score of 76.7 points on a 100-point scale. It leads second-placed AT&T by less than one point, with AT&T on 76.5, while T-Mobile ranks third on 76.1. All operators place in the Very Good (68-78) category. A Very Good (68-78) rating means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at 1080p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling.
5G Video quantifies the quality of mobile video experienced by Opensignal users on real-world video streams when they were connected to 5G. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate 5G Video, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the video experience observed by our users on each operator's 5G network on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world's largest video content providers.
T-Mobile places first for Live Video, scoring 70.3 points on a 100-point scale and finishing less than one point ahead of AT&T, which places second on 69.5 points. Verizon ranks third with 69.1 points. All operators are in the Excellent category (58 or above), which means users are, on average, able to stream video at least at 1080p with low loading times, little stalling and a satisfactory live offset.
Live Video quantifies the quality of real-time video streamed to mobile devices by measuring video streams over an operator's network. The metric extends the existing International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach used for the on-demand Video metric, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including live playback offset, picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived live video experience as reported by real people. To calculate live video experience, we are directly measuring live video streams from end-user devices and using this extension of ITU's approach to quantify the overall live video experience for each operator on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions and are streamed directly from the world's largest video content providers.
Verizon takes the award for best 5G live video experience, winning outright with 74.1 points on a 100-point scale. It leads second-placed T-Mobile and AT&T, which are statistically tied on 73.6-73.7 points. All operators place in the Excellent (58 or above) category, meaning users are, on average, able to stream video at least at 1080p with low loading times, little stalling and a satisfactory live offset.
Live Video quantifies the quality of real-time video streamed to mobile devices by measuring video streams over an operator's network. The metric extends the existing International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach used for the on-demand Video metric, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including live playback offset, picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived live video experience as reported by real people. To calculate live video experience, we are directly measuring live video streams from end-user devices and using this extension of ITU's approach to quantify the overall live video experience for each operator on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions and are streamed directly from the world's largest video content providers.
5G Live Video quantifies the quality of mobile video experienced by Opensignal users on real-world live video streams when they were connected to 5G.
T-Mobile achieves the win for the Games award with a score of 76.8 points on a 100-point scale. It leads Verizon, which places second on 73.2 points, by nearly four points, while AT&T is close behind in third with 73.0 points. T-Mobile places in the Good (75-85) category, while Verizon and AT&T rank one category lower in Fair (65-75). A Good rating means most users deem the experience acceptable, with gameplay generally controllable and immediate feedback between actions and in-game outcomes, and most users not experiencing delay. Meanwhile, Fair means users find the experience average: in most cases the game is responsive and players feel in control, but the majority notice a delay between their actions and the outcomes in the game.
Games measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator's network. Measured on a scale of 0-100, it analyzes how our users' multiplayer mobile gaming experience is affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter.
Games quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world.
Calculating Games starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users' devices to internet end-points that host real games. The score is then measured on a scale from 0 to 100.
T-Mobile also wins the 5G Games award with a score of 83.4 points out of 100. Verizon places second on 82.5, one point behind T-Mobile, while AT&T ranks third with 79.2. All three operators fall into the Good (75-85) category.
5G Games measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator's 5G network. It analyzes how our users' multiplayer mobile gaming experience was affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter. 5G Games for each operator is calculated on a scale from 0 to 100.
5G Games quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world. Calculating 5G Games starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users' devices to internet end-points that host real games.
Collecting billions of individual measurements daily from over 100 million devices globally, Opensignal independently analyzes mobile and broadband user experience on every major network operator around the globe.
Opensignal is the leading global provider of independent insights into consumers' connectivity experiences and choice of carrier. Our proprietary insights into mobile and broadband networks give operators the solutions they need to profitably compete and win, from executive level scorecards and public validation to pin-point level engineering analytics and consumer decision dynamics.
Journalists, please retain the Opensignal logo and copyright
(© Opensignal Limited) information when using this image.
This image may not be used for any commercial purpose, including use in advertisements or other promotional content, without prior written consent.
For every metric we calculate statistical confidence intervals indicated on our graphs. When confidence intervals overlap, our measured results are too close to declare a winner. In those cases, we show a statistical draw. For this reason, some metrics have multiple operator winners.
In our bar graphs we represent confidence intervals as boundaries on either sides of graph bars.
In our supporting-metric charts we show confidence intervals as +/- numerical values.
Why confidence intervals are vital in analyzing mobile network experience