Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Jio gains the Upload Speed Experience award, which was won by Airtel in the previous report in October 2024. This gain represents the only change in our awards table since the last report. Jio pulls ahead by a whisker, as our Jio users observe average overall upload speeds of 9.1Mbps compared to the 9.0Mbps seen by those with Airtel. Jio users saw the greatest improvement from the last report, as its score grew by 2.7Mbps compared to Airtel's increase of 2.1Mbps.
Airtel wins all five of the 5G Experience awards, including 5G Video Experience, 5G Live Video Experience, 5G Games Experience and both 5G speed metrics. However, Airtel’s scores for both 5G speed metrics (5G Download and 5G Upload Speed) and 5G Live Video Experience are down from those seen last time around. In contrast, our Jio users have seen improvements across all the 5G Experience metrics except for 5G Download Speed, putting pressure on Airtel.
Airtel keeps hold of the overall Video Experience award, with a slim lead over closest rival Jio — but Jio has now closed the gap to just 0.3 points (on a scale of 0-100). Our users on all four of India’s operators saw improvements in this metric since the last report. Airtel’s, Jio’s, and Vi’s scores have risen by nearly four points. Fourth-placed BSNL saw its score leap by 15 points, but it still remains a significant distance behind the pack.
Jio achieves a clean sweep of our overall Availability, 5G Availability, Consistent Quality and Reliability Experience awards. Airtel saw the greatest increase in 5G Availability, but Jio remains well ahead in this metric.
All four of India’s operators saw double-digit percentage growth in their Download Speed Experience scores. Jio keeps hold of the award for this metric, and deserves particular recognition for topping the 100Mbps milestone for the first time in our reports. Airtel wins our 5G Download Speed award — but both Jio’s and Airtel’s scores have fallen, likely due to a rise in the number of 5G users, which in turn increases the load on 5G networks.
The mobile story in India remains one of improvement, as we continue to see significant improvements across the majority of our metrics in this exciting and rapidly evolving market. However, there are further signs that India’s established 5G networks — Airtel’s and Jio’s — are slowing down, as their 5G Download scores have fallen. Opensignal identified this trend in 2024, which is likely to be the result of increased network congestion as 5G adoption accelerates and data consumption per 5G subscriber increases.
Nevertheless, India’s two 5G leaders should be congratulated on their aggressive 5G rollout strategies, which have catapulted the country to a regional leader for 5G Availability. Both Airtel’s and Jio’s 5G Availability scores are up by over five percentage points from those seen in the last report. Impressively, Jio’s score has topped the 70% availability milestone for the first time — more than double Airtel’s. However, Airtel wins all of our 5G Experience awards (including 5G Download Speed and 5G Upload Speed), reflecting the differing network rollout strategies of India’s 5G leaders.
Airtel and Jio have pursued very different strategies. Jio has rolled out a large-scale 5G standalone access (SA) network using lower band spectrum (700MHz) to boost availability in rural areas, while rolling out 5G using C band (3.5GHz) for urban centers. The Reliance-owned operator has also reserved the highest band mmWave (26GHz) only for high-capacity applications. Airtel, on the other hand, has opted for a 5G non-standalone access (NSA) approach, deploying 5G on existing 4G core infrastructure for faster rollout focussed on urban regions. Despite these different approaches, our 5G Experience metrics show that Jio is quite close behind Airtel. This benefits India’s 5G users, as increasing competition for network plaudits should spur operators on to further heights.
In India’s first 5G spectrum auction in 2022, Airtel and Jio won the vast majority of licenses across the 700MHz, 800MHz, 900MHz, 1,800MHz, 3,300MHz and 26GHz bands. Vi bought only spectrum in the 3,300MHz band in 17 circles and 26GHz band in 16 circles. The Vodafone subsidiary added 18.8MHz in the 900MHz band, 1.8MHz in 1,800MHz and 10MHz in the 2,500MHz bands in the follow-up auction in 2024 — but its spectrum holdings are still dwarfed by Airtel and Jio, particularly in the lower (sub-2,200MHz) bands.
Earlier in 2025, the Indian government confirmed the reallocation of 687MHz of spectrum for mobile use. But the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has stated that this will take mobile operators’ holdings to 320MHz — leaving a deficit of around 400MHz. Much of this outstanding spectrum is in the 6GHz higher-mid band range, and the COAI is now urging the government to auction this to help drive improvements in 5G coverage in the country.
In this report we have only included Airtel and Jio in 5G metrics at a national level — but we have been able to include Vi (Vodafone Idea) in our regional 5G reporting for the first time. Vi is currently behind the Airtel and Jio, having only launched commercially in four circles: Mumbai, Delhi, Chandigarh Region (Punjab circle) – including Chandigarh, Mohali, Zirakpur and Kharar – and Patna (Bihar circle). Opensignal’s metrics show that in Mumbai, Vi is already neck-and neck with Airtel for 5G Availability, while there is very little light between the operators in this region in terms of our 5G Video Experience, 5G Live Video Experience and 5G Games Experience metrics. But Vi remains behind the leaders Airtel and Jio in terms of 5G Download and Upload Speed. Nevertheless, in Mumbai, our Vi users see the greatest uplift out of the three 5G operators when comparing 5G Download Speed scores against those for overall Download Speed Experience. Vi’s average 5G download speeds are more than four times faster than its overall speeds. Once again, the strong competition in 5G rollout is benefitting India’s 5G users, with our recent analysis showing that Mumbai is now a regional leader in terms of 5G Availability — ahead of many leading global 5G cities such as Seoul in South Korea and Singapore.
Vi is aggressively pricing its 5G services in Mumbai, undercutting its rivals with unlimited 5G data plans starting at INR299 ($3.45) pcm, as the race for 5G subscribers intensifies. The operator now plans to roll out 5G coverage to all 17 of its priority circles (all but the Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, North East and Orissa circles) by August this year. Vi is facing a financially challenging time, as it has been in discussions with investors and lenders for over a year to raise funds, while India's Supreme Court recently dismissed petitions from operators seeking a waiver on their pending Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues - amounting to INR450 billion (US$5.23 billion) in Vi’s case. Vi has warned that it will not be able to survive beyond the 2025 financial year without relief from the government or other investors — and this instability is inevitably impacting its network rollout plans.
India’s regulator is playing its part to boost the rollout of 5G and improve mobile network performance in the country. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) auctioned much-needed bandwidth in the 900MHz and 1800MHz bands in mid-2024, and has recently published recommendations on the allocation and use of mmWave spectrum in the 37GHz-40GHz and 42.5GHz-43.5GHz ranges, proposing to include these in upcoming spectrum auctions in the country. The Indian government has also approved plans to refarm or reuse nearly 1,100MHz of spectrum before the end of the decade.
Airtel is refarming its mid-band spectrum to handle increased traffic and plans to begin the rollout of 5G SA technology imminently. The operator has recently agreed to acquire spectrum in the mmWave 26GHz band from Adani Data Networks, comprising a total of 400MHz across six circles, which will be used to boost its 5G network performance.
BSNL, India’s only non-5G national operator, remains focused on expanding its 4G services. Some of the greatest increases in scores from those seen in the previous report were observed by our BSNL users. BSNL's Consistent Quality score has increased markedly — albeit from a low base — rising to 13.8% from the 8% seen in the last report, while both its Download and Upload Speed Experience scores have more-than doubled. However, the operator remains some distance behind its rivals across all of our metrics, and will have to work hard to close this gap.
In this report we examine the mobile network experience of the four main mobile network operators in India — Airtel, BSNL, Jio, and Vi — over a period of 90 days starting on February 01, 2025, and ending on May 01, 2025, to see how they fared.
Airtel keeps the Video Experience award, with a score of 66 points on a 100-point scale. But Airtel’s lead is slim, given second-placed Jio's 65.7 points. Vi comes third with a score of 62.7 points, while BSNL is in fourth place with 42.1 points.
BSNL's score saw the greatest increase, a rise of 15 points. The other three operators’ scores have all increased by four points since the last report.
Vi, Airtel and Jio place in the Good (58-68) category, while BSNL places two categories lower, in Poor (under 48).
A Good (58-68) rating means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at 720p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling. A Poor (under 48) rating means that our users, on average, encounter very high loading times or high levels of stalling or are only able to stream the video at resolutions below 720p.
Video Experience scores account for adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR), a technology that allows Opensignal to accurately represent users' real video experience including video streams up to 4K quality.
Opensignal’s Video Experience quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's networks. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate video experience, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the overall video experience for each operator on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
In addition to Video Experience, we report on the following metrics related to video experience:
Airtel retains the Live Video Experience award with a score of 58.2 points on a 100-point scale. Jio is in second place with a score of 56.7 points while Vi comes third with a score of 53.7 points. BSNL is a fairly distant fourth with a score of 31 points.
BSNL's score saw the largest increase of 15 points since the last report. Jio and Vi's scores both increased by four points, while Airtel's score grew by three points.
Airtel places in the Excellent (58 or above) category, while Vi and Jio place one category lower, in Very Good (53-58). BSNL places in the Poor (under 33) category.
An Excellent (58 or above) rating means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at least at 1080p with low loading times, little stalling and a satisfactory live offset. A Very Good (53-58) rating means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at least at 720p or 1080p with low loading times, little stalling and a satisfactory live offset. A Poor (under 33) rating means that our users, on average, encounter very high loading times, stalling or live offset or are only able to stream the video at resolutions below 480p.
Operators’ Live Video Experience scores are determined using a range of measures that impact users’ perceived live streaming viewing experience, including picture quality, video loading time, and stall rate, but also live playback offset — the time difference between real-time and the current playback position a viewer sees.
Unlike Video Experience, which represents on-demand video streams, Live Video Experience quantifies live video streaming used for current events. For example when users watch live sports, game streams, music concerts, or news where the event is happening at that moment in time.
Opensignal’s Live Video Experience quantifies the quality of real-time video streamed to mobile devices by measuring video streams over an operator's network. The metric extends the existing International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach used for Opensignal's on-demand Video Experience metric, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including live playback offset, picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived live video experience as reported by real people. To calculate live video experience, we are directly measuring live video streams from end-user devices and using this extension of ITU's approach to quantify the overall live video experience for each operator on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
Airtel has kept hold of the Games Experience award, winning it this time with a score of 71.7 points on a 100-point scale. Vi is close behind with a score of 70.6 points, while Jio comes third with 68 points, and BSNL is in fourth place with a score of 54.8 points.
BSNL's score saw the greatest increase — a rise of 16 points from that seen in the last report. Vi's score has increased by seven points, while both Airtel’s and Jio's scores have improved by six points.
Airtel, Jio, and Vi place in the Fair (65-75) category, while BSNL places one category lower, in Poor (40-65).
A Fair (65-75) rating means that users find the experience to be ‘average’. In most cases the game is responsive to the actions of the player with most users feeling like they have control over the game. The majority of players notice a delay between their actions and the outcomes in the game.
A Poor (40-65) rating means that most users find this level of experience unacceptable. The majority of users see a delay in the gameplay experience and they do not receive immediate feedback on their actions. Many users feel a lack of controllability.
Opensignal’s Games Experience measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator’s network. Measured on a scale of 0-100, it analyzes how our users’ multiplayer mobile gaming experience is affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter.
Games Experience quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world.
Calculating Games Experience starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users’ devices to internet end-points that host real games. The score is then measured on a scale from 0 to 100.
In addition to Games Experience, we report on the following metrics related to games experience:
Jio has kept hold of the Download Experience award with a score of 106.3Mbps — a lead of 48Mbps over second-placed Airtel. Vi comes third with a score of 21.8Mbps, while BSNL is in fourth place with a score of 7.3Mbps.
Jio's score has increased the most — a rise of 17Mbps. Airtel's score has improved by 14Mbps. Our Vi and BSNL users have seen more modest increases — 5Mbps and 4Mbps, respectively.
Measured in Mbps, Download Speed Experience represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across an operator’s mobile data networks.
In addition to Download Speed Experience, we report on the following metrics related to download speeds:
Jio has gained the Upload Speed Experience award, which was won by Airtel in the last report. Jio wins with a score of 9.1Mbps, putting it narrowly ahead of second-placed Airtel’s 9Mbps. Vi comes third with a score of 5.7Mbps, while BSNL is in fourth place with 2.1Mbps.
Our Jio users saw the greatest increase in average overall upload speeds from those seen in the last report — a rise of 3Mbps. Airtel's score has increased by 2Mbps, while BSNL’s and Vi’s scores both rose by 1Mbps.
Upload Speed Experience measures the average upload speeds for each operator observed by our users across their mobile data networks. Typically upload speeds are slower than download speeds, as current mobile broadband technologies focus resources on providing the best possible download speed for users consuming content on their devices. As mobile internet trends move away from downloading content to creating content and supporting real-time communications services, upload speeds are becoming more vital and new technologies are emerging that boost upstream capacity.
In addition to Upload Speed Experience, we report on five supporting metrics related to upload speeds:
Airtel retains the 5G Video Experience award with a score of 74.9 points on a 100-point scale, giving it a lead of just under three points over second-placed Jio.
Jio's score has increased by one point, while Airtel's score hasn't statistically changed since the last report.
Both operators place in the Very Good (68-78) category.
A Very Good (68-78) rating means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at 1080p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling.
5G Video Experience scores account for adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR), a technology that allows Opensignal to accurately represent users' real video experience including video streams up to 4K quality.
5G Video Experience quantifies the quality of mobile video experienced by Opensignal users on real-world video streams when they were connected to 5G. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate 5G Video Experience, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the video experience observed by our users on each operator’s 5G network on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
Airtel keeps hold of the 5G Live Video Experience award with a score of 68.9 points on a 100-point scale — a lead of three points over second-placed Jio.
Jio's score has increased by one point, while Airtel's score decreased by one point.
Both operators place in the Excellent (58 or above) category.
An Excellent (58 or above) rating means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at least at 1080p with low loading times, little stalling and a satisfactory live offset.
Operators’ 5G Live Video Experience scores are determined using a range of measures that impact users’ perceived live streaming viewing experience, including picture quality, video loading time, and stall rate, but also live playback offset — the time difference between real-time and the current playback position a viewer sees.
Unlike 5G Video Experience, which represents on-demand video streams, 5G Live Video Experience quantifies live video streaming used for current events. For example when users watch live sports, game streams, music concerts, or news where the event is happening at that moment in time.
Opensignal’s Live Video Experience quantifies the quality of real-time video streamed to mobile devices by measuring video streams over an operator's network. The metric extends the existing International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach used for Opensignal's on-demand Video Experience metric, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including live playback offset, picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived live video experience as reported by real people. To calculate live video experience, we are directly measuring live video streams from end-user devices and using this extension of ITU's approach to quantify the overall live video experience for each operator on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
5G Live Video Experience quantifies the quality of mobile video experienced by Opensignal users on real-world live video streams when they were connected to 5G.
Airtel retains the 5G Games Experience award with a score of 81 points on a 100-point scale — a lead of three points over second-placed Jio.
Jio's score has increased by three points from that seen last time around, while Airtel's score improved by less than one point.
Both operators place in the Good (75-85) category.
A Good (75-85) rating means that most users deem the experience acceptable. The gameplay experience is generally controllable and the user receives immediate feedback between their actions and the outcomes in the game. Most users do not experience a delay between their actions and the game.
5G Games Experience measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator's 5G network. It analyzes how our users’ multiplayer mobile gaming experience was affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter. 5G Games Experience for each operator is calculated on a scale from 0 to 100.
5G Games Experience quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world. Calculating 5G Games Experience starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users’ devices to internet end-points that host real games.
Airtel keeps hold of the 5G Download Speed award, with a score of 212Mbps and a lead of 8Mbps over Jio.
However, Airtel's score has decreased by 28Mbps since the last report, while Jio's fell by 21Mbps.
5G Download Speed shows the average download speed experienced by Opensignal users across an operator’s 5G network. 5G Download Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
Airtel retains the 5G Upload Speed award with a score of 22.6Mbps, giving it a lead of 7Mbps over second-placed Jio.
Jio's score has increased by over 2Mbps since the last report, while Airtel's score has dropped by close to 1Mbps.
5G Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds experienced by Opensignal users across an operator’s 5G network. 5G Upload Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
Jio keeps hold of the Availability award with a score of 99.5%, giving it a narrow lead over second-placed Airtel's 99%. Vi comes third with a score of 96.3%, while BSNL is fourth with 84.4%.
BSNL's score saw the greatest increase of six percentage points since the last report. Vi's score has improved by one percentage point, while Airtel and Jio both saw minor increases of less than one percentage point.
Our availability metrics are not a measure of a network’s geographical extent. They won’t tell you whether you are likely to get a signal if you plan to visit a remote rural or nearly uninhabited region. Instead, they measure what proportion of time people have a network connection, in the places they most commonly frequent — something often missed by traditional coverage metrics. Looking at when users have a connection rather than where, provides us with a more precise reflection of the true user experience.
We also keep track of the instances that leave mobile users most frustrated: when there is no signal to connect to at all. The most common dead zones users struggle with occur indoors. As most of our availability data is collected indoors (as that’s where users spend most of their time), we’re particularly astute at detecting areas of zero signal.
Our availability metrics take a user-centric, time-based approach that complements the user-centric and geographical-based methodology used by our reach metrics.
Availability shows the proportion of time all Opensignal users on an operator’s network had either a 3G, 4G or 5G connection.
Jio keeps the 5G Availability award with an impressive score of 71.8% — a lead of 42 percentage points over second-placed Airtel.
Both operators’ scores have increased by around five percentage points compared to those seen in the last report.
Our availability metrics are not a measure of a network’s geographical extent. They won’t tell you whether you are likely to get a signal if you plan to visit a remote rural or nearly uninhabited region. Instead, they measure what proportion of time people have a network connection, in the places they most commonly frequent — something often missed by traditional coverage metrics. Looking at when users have a connection rather than where, provides us with a more precise reflection of the true user experience.
We also keep track of the instances that leave mobile users most frustrated: when there is no signal to connect to at all. The most common dead zones users struggle with occur indoors. As most of our availability data is collected indoors (as that’s where users spend most of their time), we’re particularly astute at detecting areas of zero signal.
Our availability metrics take a user-centric, time-based approach that complements the user-centric and geographical-based methodology used by our reach metrics.
5G Availability shows the proportion of time Opensignal users with a 5G device and a 5G subscription had an active 5G connection.
Jio holds onto the Consistent Quality award with a score of 66.9%, giving it a lead of three percentage points over second-placed Airtel. Vi comes third with a score of 56.3% while BSNL is in fourth place with 13.8%.
BSNL’s score has improved the most since the last report — a rise of six percentage points. Vi's score has increased by two percentage points, while both Airtel’s and Jio’s scores have improved slightly — each by less than one percentage point.
This metric measures if the network is sufficient to support common mobile application requirements at a level that is ‘good enough’ for users to maintain (or complete) various typical demanding tasks on their devices. It assesses a number of experience indicators such as download speed, upload speed, latency, jitter, packet loss, and time to first byte.
Consistent Quality measures if the network is sufficient to support common mobile application requirements at a level that is ‘good enough’ for users to maintain (or complete) various typical tasks on their devices.
We combine different experience indicators such as download throughput, upload throughput, latency, jitter, packet discard, and time to first byte to calculate Consistent Quality. These components are evaluated against thresholds recommended by various more demanding common applications used for a range of common tasks.
To calculate the metric value, the proportion of tests that pass the requirements of Consistent Quality is multiplied by the test success ratio, which is the proportion of completed tests to all tests conducted. Tests that pass indicate that activities such as video calling, uploading an image to social media, or using smart home applications will be possible without noticeable lag or slowdown.
Jio wins the Reliability Experience award with a score of 860 points on a 100-1000 point scale — a lead of 27 points over second-placed Airtel. Vi comes third with a score of 777 points, while BSNL is in fourth place with 394 points.
Opensignal’s Reliability Experience measures the ability of our users to connect to and successfully complete (basic) tasks on operators’ networks. It consists of the following components:
% time connected — The proportion of time Opensignal users can successfully connect to a mobile network
Data Connectivity — the proportion of time when the network is available and the device can connect to the internet
Task completion — whether tasks initiated by the user’s device are completed
Sufficiency — The probability that (basic) tasks will be executed sufficiently well for the user
Opensignal’s Reliability Experience measures the ability of Opensignal users to connect to and successfully complete (basic) tasks on communication service providers’ (CSP) networks. It analyzes how much Opensignal users’ experience is affected by the radio access and core network, along with issues that prevent them from connecting to the internet even if they have a connection to their CSP’s network. It also factors in users’ ability to successfully use lower performance applications including SD video, over-the-top voice calls and web browsing.
Collecting billions of individual measurements daily from over 100 million devices globally, Opensignal independently analyzes mobile and broadband user experience on every major network operator around the globe.
Opensignal is the leading global provider of independent insights into consumers' connectivity experiences and choice of carrier. Our proprietary insights into mobile and broadband networks give operators the solutions they need to profitably compete and win, from executive level scorecards and public validation to pin-point level engineering analytics and consumer decision dynamics.
Journalists, please retain the Opensignal logo and copyright
(© Opensignal Limited) information when using this image.
This image may not be used for any commercial purpose, including use in advertisements or other promotional content, without prior written consent.
For every metric we calculate statistical confidence intervals indicated on our graphs. When confidence intervals overlap, our measured results are too close to declare a winner. In those cases, we show a statistical draw. For this reason, some metrics have multiple operator winners.
In our bar graphs we represent confidence intervals as boundaries on either sides of graph bars.
In our supporting-metric charts we show confidence intervals as +/- numerical values.
Why confidence intervals are vital in analyzing mobile network experience